Another interesting posting from the Bioteams site: a useful model to consider when planning team formation or group tasks. Could also be useful in analysing team roles:-
http://www.bioteams.com/2008/09/08/the_3_rings.html#more
Monday, 8 September 2008
Sunday, 7 September 2008
Saturday, 6 September 2008
The need for structure
I just posted the following on Blackboard - and the wiki:
"I had thought we would use the wiki for collaborative work on documents/projects where called on by the activities in the learning materials. However, I see this is now taking off as a great networking site in its own right and the ability to add photos and videos etc makes it more fun. A disadvantage is that not everyone can access or edit whilst at work.....
I envisioned the blog being used for: longer reflections on the materials, interesting articles and websites; sharing videos; responses to activities that specifically asked you to post your reflections on the blog. Again - not everyone can access form work: currently this is the least used site though I am not sure why. Any comments?
Blackboard is still the main place for course information, announcements, discussion about the materials and problems. It seems that everyone can access this from work but one or two have difficulties with their broadband connection from home. I see this as the "official" place to meet. What do you think? "
This is an important discussion point: new teams coming together have to quickly establish norms - especially for communication, to ensure that everyone is included and important messages don't get lost. In communicating with a dispersed team it is perhaps doubly important to get some clarity early on about communication channels.
But how good are we at doing this in "conventional" teams?
Email distribution lists aren't perfect; people are invited to meetings they don't need to attend, others aren't invited who should be part of the decision making, conversations happen behind closed doors that affect our jobs.....Sorting out our communication protocols is important work that is often overlooked. So it's good that we are addressing this as a "team"!!
"I had thought we would use the wiki for collaborative work on documents/projects where called on by the activities in the learning materials. However, I see this is now taking off as a great networking site in its own right and the ability to add photos and videos etc makes it more fun. A disadvantage is that not everyone can access or edit whilst at work.....
I envisioned the blog being used for: longer reflections on the materials, interesting articles and websites; sharing videos; responses to activities that specifically asked you to post your reflections on the blog. Again - not everyone can access form work: currently this is the least used site though I am not sure why. Any comments?
Blackboard is still the main place for course information, announcements, discussion about the materials and problems. It seems that everyone can access this from work but one or two have difficulties with their broadband connection from home. I see this as the "official" place to meet. What do you think? "
This is an important discussion point: new teams coming together have to quickly establish norms - especially for communication, to ensure that everyone is included and important messages don't get lost. In communicating with a dispersed team it is perhaps doubly important to get some clarity early on about communication channels.
But how good are we at doing this in "conventional" teams?
Email distribution lists aren't perfect; people are invited to meetings they don't need to attend, others aren't invited who should be part of the decision making, conversations happen behind closed doors that affect our jobs.....Sorting out our communication protocols is important work that is often overlooked. So it's good that we are addressing this as a "team"!!
Thursday, 4 September 2008
Something I just read and wanted to share
http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2008/07/16/why-most-online-communities-fail/
I got this on Twitter from Ken Thompson who runs the bio teams site.....
could be useful to remember for those of you wanting to set up your own sites at work:
I got this on Twitter from Ken Thompson who runs the bio teams site.....
could be useful to remember for those of you wanting to set up your own sites at work:
- invest time in reaching your readers, not money on the tech kit
- have someone looking after the site who knows what they are doing
- make sure you have agreed the right measures of success
Monday, 1 September 2008
Face Book and Virtual Teams - who'd have thought?
I found this group site on Face Book which may be of interest:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10903468141
It lists some interesting web sites and articles. It occurs to me too that Face Book itself can be a great tool for keeping in touch with a group. It's certainly worth exploring the technology - and who knows - having some fun too?
Here's an interesting website it lists (if you can't access the FB page)
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=10903468141
It lists some interesting web sites and articles. It occurs to me too that Face Book itself can be a great tool for keeping in touch with a group. It's certainly worth exploring the technology - and who knows - having some fun too?
Here's an interesting website it lists (if you can't access the FB page)
http://www.leadingvirtually.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)